Ediblog.com
Liberally Ignorant
©2004 Dr. Judith Reisman
Ellen Ratner is "liberally
ignorant."
As a
proud left-wing hysteric, Ratner should be especially popular now, having hopped
aboard the million-dollar publicity bandwagon to "resurrect" Kinsey as
a Hollywood idol.
Alfred Kinsey
published "Sexual Behavior in the Human Male" (1948) and "Sexual
Behavior in the Human Female" (1953). These were Rockefeller-funded
fictions, masquerading as the "real" story of American sexual conduct,
for which Kinsey and his Indiana University boy-toys claimed to have
"interviewed thousands of human subjects."
Kinsey
was a pathological liar – so were his handsome buddies, chosen from the
academic casting couch. And these were their better qualities.
Kinsey
and company lied to the world, including our lawmakers, about normal human
sexuality. We changed our behavior and our laws based on these lies.
He
said it was science.
It was
fraud.
Bad
data produce bad results.
We've
all paid dearly for Kinsey's bad data.
Now
sex is everywhere and 58,200 children under age 18 were kidnapped – not
by family members – from our streets in 1999, most returning home
sexually abused. Nor does the 418 percent increase in "forcible" rape
and the 523 percent increase in unmarried births circa 1960 to 1999 reflect
"Victorian prudery."
Kinsey
cooked his "data," tossed out what he didn't like (75 percent in fact)
and did all that while slipping in and out of gay baths and beds as he wooed
pedophiles (really, pederasts) to rape up to 2,035 infants and children for him
and his "findings."
He
said that no women were ever harmed by rape, that 95 percent of our men were
wildly promiscuous and 10 percent to 37 percent sometime homosexual. All this
while American dads, brothers and husbands fought and died overseas so Kinsey
could keep his boyfriends deferred, close to him and his attic, at home.
Great
pioneer, he.
Like
most liberals, Ratner thinks Hollywood moguls have the moral edge to teach us
less savvy right-wing, sexually negative and repressed folks about "sex and
sexuality."
Ratner
is ignorant. She should read Kinsey's books. She'd do well to read mine, but at
least read Kinsey.
The
new Fox Searchlight movie starring Liam Neeson, called "Kinsey" is
not, as Ratner claims, about "the life of Dr. Alfred Kinsey." Had she
read even one of Kinsey's books, she would know the film plays Kinsey as a
sexually revolutionary Indiana Jones.
Kinsey
was not a scientist.
He was
a barbaric criminal sexual psychopath who hid his own sexual disorders and
crimes and that of his "mates" from the world while claiming to reveal
the truth about everyone else's sexual life.
He was
the biggest hypocrite in scientific history. But that's the good part.
Ratner
says, "Kinsey does not attach any moral conclusions to human sexual
behavior." That statement is sufficient proof that Ratner is either
illiterate or she found the man's text too difficult to read and stopped at the
cover page.
Ms.
Ratner quotes a definition of "science" as "the observation,
identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical
explanation of phenomena."
OK.
But
then she says, "Kinsey is simply making conclusion based on the observation
of reality." Even if Ratner's granddaddy was an adulterer, that does not
make Kinsey's "data" on male adultery true.
No,
Kinsey created the myths around human sexuality that are now killing us. Ratner
needs more oxygen when she says, "science is a "pure" measurement
of reality. Good science [like Kinsey's] does not allow itself to be manipulated
by agenda."
Wow!
Rapists
commonly insist their victims had "orgasms." Ms. Ratner, go and
proudly get Kinsey's "Male" volume at the library. Find page 180 and
tell the WND readers what you read as Table 34! Tell them!
Explain
that Kinsey writes there that a 5-month-old had "3 orgasms," an
11-month-old, he says, had 14
"orgasms" in 38 minutes,
a 2 1/2-year-old with two alleged "orgasms" a minute, a 4-year-old
with 6 "orgasms" in 5 minutes,
a 4-year-old with 26 orgasms in 24-hours;
"scientifically." Read Tables 30 through 34 describing the
"speed" in split seconds of infant "orgasms" and then
pronounce yourself "proud."
Then read
and ponder Kinsey's
"agenda" in what he called an "orgasm" on pages 160-161.
Report that he writes about how his pedophiles experimented on 196 boys, all
under age 13, around the clock.
Tell the truth! Kinsey swore
these children experienced "orgasms" as:
violent
convulsion ... mouth distorted, sometimes with tongue protruding; whole body or
parts of it spasmodically twitching, sometimes synchronously with throbs or
violent jerking of the penis ... violent convulsions of the whole body; ...
sobbing, or more violent cries, sometimes with an abundance of tears (especially
among younger children) ... hysterical laughing, talking, sadistic or
masochistic reactions ... extreme trembling ... sometimes fainting of subject
... Pained or frightened ... some ... suffer excruciating pain ... will fight
... may make violent attempts to avoid climax, although they derive definite
pleasure from the situation [my emphasis]
If you
are afraid to read my books on Kinsey, read nothing else but these pages and
Kinsey's charts documenting infant "orgasms" based on the
"evidence" of child rapists.
After
you have done this, Ms. Ratner, you can publicly apologize to any who have
listened to you and to all whose honor you have besmirched. Next, you can do the
logical thing and demand a congressional investigation of the Kinsey Institute
for their decades of cover-up and, finally, judicial seizure of their files!
By the
way, ask yourself how did Kinsey "collect ... early adolescent sperm"
and a boy's "first ejaculate" from a diary?
I am
waiting.
Dr.
Judith A. Reisman is
president of the Institute for Media Education and is the author of is a renowned author (Kinsey:
Crimes & Consequences) and researcher.